Home » logic » Fighting “crazy” with “reason” in the Op-Eds

Fighting “crazy” with “reason” in the Op-Eds

Recent Comments

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 328 other followers


I’ve found myself inspired by a tweet from Michael Shermer (whose book, The Believing Brain, I’m still reading by the way – sheesh now that I don’t fly any more I need to figure out how to effectively step away from the internet and crack open my books every once in a while – but that’s a different post altogether), or rather a couple of tweets quoting University of Lethbridge geography professor Dan Johnson.

Dan wrote a post in the “Public Professor” column of the Lethbridge Herald called Healthy skepticism is a useful tool that got Michael’s attention and then Michael quoted Dan’s follow up advice which I think is awesome!

 “I am a believer in people trying to influence their local communities, and maybe contribute to the healthy skepticism the typical person. I think if every skeptic did that, in a thousand local newspapers, we would be ahead.”

And there it was, “in a thousand local newspapers.” In other words, we skeptics and freethinkers can’t simply roll over and give up the op-ed sections and the letters to the editor sections to the nut jobs, the conspiracy theorists, the theocrats, etc.

We have to fill those newspaper columns and those online comment sections with reason, logic, science, facts, and compassion whenever we get the opportunity.

Write on friends!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: